I had a chance to speak with Jason Cohen, president of Penn State’s new “Gong Fu Cha” institute. The institute aims to: “build a tea library in order to document the vintages of tea and to propagate through instruction the art of GongFu Cha.” If you go to Penn State, you can join the institute every Wednesday from 6-9 in the HUB-Robeson Center. I asked Jason a series of questions… here we go:
What got you started in tea?
I got started in tea in the summer of 2007. I was in China for about 2 months, during which I lived with a family in Kunming and helped build a school on the border of Sichuan Province and the Tibet Autonomous Region. The Puerh craze was arguably in its height that summer and Kunming is the center of the Puerh trade. Tea was everywhere. I fell into it, it was part of a culture that I was trying to understand and absorb. I bought the Gongfu set p, and I watched others brew, but I did not fully understand until later that year after I started brewing consistently at home. Now I brew twice a day (almost) every day, and I am still by no means an expert. Tea is an art, not a science. I can rattle off the chemical composition of tea, but that does not make me a better brewer, I can pinpoint where most of the Puerh I drink was grown, yet that still does not make me enjoy the tea more. While the tea knowledge is part of the process, its the enjoyment of tea that make the pursuit worthwhile.
What made you start the club? Was tea being well received amongst your friends? Was it a growing hobby?
The impetus for starting the institute was twofold. It is not actually a club per-se, I am currently working with the student organization to be recognized as a University Institution. My goal is to teach the art of Gongfu Cha in order to preserve it for future generations, and to start the worlds first (and so far only) Academic Tea Library. Right now there is no central depository, or reliable catalog for tea. We don’t know what the 1950’s hong yin tasted like in all its stages of maturity. We don’t know how the amount of roasting has changed over the years for Taiwan’s high mountain Oolongs. The general consensus is that they have gotten greener, yet that begs the question of how have the flavors and the prevalent amount of roasting changed. How much greener have they become? when did this trend become noticeable? There are wine libraries scattered throughout Europe. It is not so far-fetched to build a Tea Library, especially with the backing of a University such as Penn State. I started talking, and then presenting on tea about a year after I returned from my first trip to China. At first I was surprised at how well it was received. Now I have found that most people have an interest in the cultural aspect and a desire to learn more. We can see this in the general population with the spread of Teavana and the like. While the spread of tea into the general population is good, part of the institutes goals is to rectify the spread of false information and make sure that “biscotti almond monkey picked Oolong” never becomes a standard.
Will you only be focusing on Chinese teas and the Gongfu Tea Ceremony?
The Institute’s focus will be on Gongfu Cha. It is a Superior method of brewing for the enjoyment and “connoisseurship” of tea. As a followup to my research on tea in China, I lived on a the Makaibari tea plantation in Korsong (Darjeeling), India. I harvested my own crop of tea and had a chance to compare the tea culture and methods of the two Countries. I have found the Chinese Culture and Methods to be superior. That is not to discredit Indian tea, it is to say that the China was the originator of tea culture and it was only through the British that India became a tea producing and drinking country. The majority of the institute’s time will be spent with Chinese Tea and Gonfu Cha, but as we expand we will include and learn about Japanese Cha Dao, Korean Darye, Tibetan yak butter tea (I may be the only foreigner who has ever enjoyed the potent mix of rancid butter, sour milk, Pu’er tea, and salt), and tea from India (which does not have a tea ceremony).
Where will you get your teas from? What companies have you been using or are you sourcing them yourself?
I source all of the teas myself through friends and acquaintances who I trust throughout China. Although I cannot endorse any company because of my position and affiliation with a future university institution, I will say that Scott Wilson of Yunnan Sourcing, Jake & Rob of Andao, Hobbs of the “Half Dipper Blog”, and Stéphane of “Tea Masters Blog”, have all been a huge help in all of my tea endeavors.
What do you do when you meet? Do you run through tea tastings?
A normal meeting consists of a brief lecture on a type or aspect of tea, Followed by a extended tasting of one tea, or a comparative brewing of two teas. I have created flavor maps to help our members describe the tastes and aromas, and we are constantly adding new ones to the list. During a comparative brewing session we talk about each tea during each brew. During a extended tasting, we are silent. We each get a note card and write down our own review. After the session we discuses each others reviews. It can be enlightening how similar or different each review can be. Often members will exclaim at a certain point “That’s what I was tasting!”. Once we have permanent facilities, I will begin to hold Teaching sessions for members to learn to brew themselves. Currently we Have 40+ members on our list serve (our newsletter), And thankfully we constantly have 8 members present per meeting (I don’t have the equipment to brew for more than 8).
You said you are going to build up a library of teas, does this mean a Pu-erh archive as well?
The Tea Library will Include exemplary examples of all kinds of tea. We are aware that it would be impossible to include every tea in the Library. Instead of going the “Library of Congress” route, We have decided only to include the teas that exemplify the qualities of its type.
Leave a Reply
Tags: penn state, tea, tea library
Posted in Tea Culture | 2 Comments »
Well said. I’d like to add a few comments if I may:
1. The problem doesn’t start with retailers. Most wholesalers in the US buy from other wholesalers in the US and sell the same tea – only marked up. REAL transparency through the supply chain, will bring down the cost of GOOD tea AND raise profits for retailers.
2. I hope we get some real tea reviews. I’m tired of seeing people say, “Well, I don’t normally like Darjeelings but I thought I’d try this one. I don’t like it.” Ahhhg. That’s not a useful review!!! The one problem with this is that, with orthodox specialty tea, every “plucking” (one day’s harvest which is processed from beginning to end as a unique lot) is DIFFERENT. Sometimes remarkably so. So unlike wine where you can rate a season at a time, there may be 100 or more unique harvests just within the category of First Flush Darjeeling Puttabong 2009. So the reviews are only useful on flavored teas (assuming the blender is uniform in their approach) and in identifying which retailers/wholesalers consistently carry top quality teas.
3. I believe there will always be opportunity for retailers to create private label custom blends, but I agree that a classic tea should be “branded” by it’s source. You don’t see each liquor store or wine shop tearing off the labels and putting their own on there.
4. I’d love to see real educational opportunities. In fact I’ve been in talks with several industry leaders about making this type of thing happen. Even the widely popular and respected certification courses are often led by volunteers who can’t agree on the correct answer to some key questions. There is no uniformity of information and there is NO WAY that I can see to learn in a short period of time what you need to know to be successful in this business – unless you take a job with a tea company. Most educators (not all) are people who failed in business and so decided to teach. I know MANY of these people!! While I respect them and their intellect, they simply cannot know whether or not the information they provide is that which will make the student successful.
I’d like to say AMEN to what Charles has said, and add my response to the “free information” part of both his comment and the main article.
I have been studying tea for 15 years, and been a professional teacher (but never a tea shop/wholesale business owner). I agree that most of the certification and education for tea out there in English is laughable. But the free information movement has some problems too–for example, the state of English language tea information is dreadfully poor. I have a tea information wiki that used to be open and free like Wikipedia. However, about 95% of the information added were either blatantly commercial (”This company makes the BEST tea ever!!”) or blatantly incorrect with no source citation. Since then I have made the wiki for members only and the average quality of information has increased directly as a result of making the information NOT free.
The other problem with the free information idea is that information from producing countries is, in many cases, not in English. I know a number of translators and they are not cheap. So again getting GOOD information has very real costs involved. Note that MIT may have opened their online classes for free–those classes are, in essence, underwritten by the money paid by the students who go to in-person classes. Also, not all classes are available online, so the online classes may function as a marketing tool for MIT’s paid classes.
I am working on building a tea school, drawing on expertise from producing countries (currently building relationships with producers in Taiwan and a Chinese agricultural university specializing in tea, as well as the aforementioned translators) to provide accurate tea information. But I worry that the idea that “information is free” will undermine serious students’ willingness to pay for the accurate and well-researched information when there is so much wrong-and-free information available.
Are researchers, translators, and professional teachers–not tea business owners who teach on the side–destined to a life of poverty? If the “information is free” philosophy is correct, then these professions will die a painful death, doing long hours of hard work for no financial return.
Personally, I think there’s another option: recognizing that GOOD information is worth paying for, and that most of what you get for free is worth what you pay for it.
Oh I LOVE THIS>. I am SO against Fast Foods!
Yes I see how concepts from slow food will increase consumers’ desire for knowledge about the source and quality of the tea they drink. Some of that knowledge and info will be free, because consumers will expect it.
Re- tea reviewers: The “I like/don’t like it” reviews never did have much value, unless you found the reviewer with your exact tastes in every tea. Charles’s comment about the usefulness of reviews has some truth, but the day could come when premier reviewers become the Robert Parkers of tea. Tea consumers actually wait to hear the reviews before purchasing tea. As a result, tea retailers would rush their new teas to those premier reviewers to get the word out. Along with the tea reviewer, you will also see the rise of the one-stop comparison shopping for tea. This will beat the current model of going to each tea retailer to collect product information before making a purchase. An online marketplace will put all the Ming Qian Dragonwells in one place with reviews there to help consumers make the right choice.
Michael- Agreed. Good, thorough research and information is hard work and will have to be bought in some form. The NY Times is finally catching on to this. Ad revenue models no longer fully support free content.